Complete Summary and Solutions for Bricks, Beads and Bones: The Harappan Civilisation – NCERT Class XII History, Chapter 1 – Urban Planning, Artefacts, Society, Decline, Questions

Comprehensive summary and explanation of Chapter 1 'Bricks, Beads and Bones: The Harappan Civilisation' from the NCERT Class XII History textbook, including details on archaeological evidence, urban settlement patterns, craft production, social structure, trade links, artefacts like seals and beads, burial practices, and the decline of the civilisation, with all textbook questions and answers.

Updated: 1 week ago

Categories: NCERT, Class XII, History, Chapter 1, Harappan Civilisation, Archaeology, Urbanisation, Ancient India, Society, Trade, Decline, Summary, Questions, Answers
Tags: Harappan Civilisation, Indus Valley, Archaeology, Urban Planning, Artefacts, Seals, Beads, Bricks, Burial Customs, Craft Production, Trade, Ancient India, NCERT, Class 12, History, Chapter 1, Summary, Questions, Answers
Post Thumbnail
Bricks, Beads and Bones: The Harappan Civilisation - Class 12 NCERT Chapter 1 Ultimate Study Guide 2025

Bricks, Beads and Bones: The Harappan Civilisation

Chapter 1: Themes in Indian History Part I - Ultimate Study Guide | NCERT Class 12 Notes, Questions, Examples & Quiz 2025

Full Chapter Summary & Detailed Notes - Bricks, Beads and Bones: The Harappan Civilisation Class 12 NCERT

Overview & Key Concepts

  • Chapter Goal: Explore the Harappan (Indus Valley) Civilisation through archaeological evidence; understand urban planning, subsistence, social structure, and decline. Exam Focus: Sites (Harappa, Mohenjo-daro), artefacts (seals, beads), interpretations (diet, burials); diagrams (drains, Great Bath). 2025 Updates: Emphasis on Saraswati basin role, gender in burials, modern debates on decline (climate vs. invasion). Fun Fact: Undeciphered script holds clues to 5000-year-old mystery. Core Idea: Harappan was a Bronze Age urban society (2600-1900 BCE) with standardised planning; evidence from 2000+ sites reveals egalitarian traits. Real-World: Influences modern urban drainage; ties to Rigveda debates. Expanded: All subtopics (1.1-1.4) point-wise with evidence, interpretations, changes over time for conceptual depth.
  • Wider Scope: From Early (pre-2600 BCE) to Mature/Late phases; regional variations; how archaeology reconstructs past without texts.
  • Expanded Content: Include maps/sites, artefact analysis, debates (e.g., ritual use of Great Bath); principles of interpretation, multi-disciplinary approaches (botany, zoology).
Fig. 1.1: A Harappan Seal (Description)

Steatite seal (2x2 cm) with unicorn motif, undeciphered script (7 signs), boss for string; symbol of trade/admin; found at Mohenjo-daro.

1. Terminologies, Places and Time

  • Harappan/Indus Valley Civilisation: Named after Harappa (Punjab, 1921 discovery); spans NW India/Pakistan; 6000-1300 BCE.
  • Phases: Early Harappan (6000-2600 BCE: formative, farming villages); Mature (2600-1900 BCE: urban peak, cities like Mohenjo-daro); Late (1900-1300 BCE: decline, de-urbanisation).
  • Geographical Spread: Afghanistan to Maharashtra; core in Indus-Saraswati basins; artefacts (pottery, seals, weights) found in Gujarat, Rajasthan, UP.
  • Sites: Major: Harappa, Mohenjo-daro, Dholavira, Ganweriwala, Rakhigarhi; over 2000 sites, 2/3 in Saraswati basin (immense importance for water/agriculture).
  • Dating Terms: BP (Before Present), BCE (Before Common Era), CE (Common Era), c. (circa: approximate).
Map 1: Some Important Mature Harappan Sites (Description)

Sketch map: Sites like Harappa (Ravi), Mohenjo-daro (Indus), Dholavira (Gujarat), Kalibangan (Saraswati); rivers (Indus, Ravi, Sutlej); Arabian Sea coast.

2. Harappan Settlements

  • Distribution: 2000+ sites; most between Indus-Saraswati; categories: cities (5 major), regional centres, villages, ports (Lothal), manufacturing (Chanhudaro).
  • Urban Features: Baked bricks, drains, citadels; standardised (e.g., Citadel high west, Lower Town east).
  • Variations: Fortified (Dholavira entire), unfortified Citadel (Lothal); reservoirs (Dholavira).
Map 2: Areas of Early Harappan Occupation (Description)

Sketch map: Sites like Kot Diji, Amri-Nal, Siswal; early cultures pre-Mature; Indus region.

3. Beginnings

  • Pre-Harappan Cultures: Small settlements with pottery, agriculture, pastoralism; no large buildings; e.g., Mehrgarh (7000 BCE farming).
  • Transition: Gradual from 7000 BCE villages to urban Mature phase; internal development, no sudden invasion.
  • Evidence: Shared pottery, subsistence; Mature in Early areas (e.g., Gujarat millets).

4. Subsistence Strategies

  • Diet Reconstruction: Charred grains/seeds (archaeo-botanists); wheat, barley, lentils, chickpeas, sesame; Gujarat millets; rare rice.
  • Animals: Bones (zoo-archaeologists): Domesticated cattle, sheep, goat, buffalo, pig; wild boar, deer, gharial (hunted?); fish/fowl.
  • Evidence: No direct proof of hunting, but wild bones suggest trade/use.

4.1 Agricultural Technologies

  • Practices: Plough evidence (terracotta models at Banawali, Kalibangan field furrows at right angles for mixed crops).
  • Tools: Oxen implied (bull seals); harvesting: stone blades/metal? (debate).
  • Irrigation: Semi-arid sites; canals (Shortughai, Afghanistan); wells/reservoirs (Dholavira); silted ancient canals likely.
Fig. 1.3: A Terracotta Bull (Description)

Small figurine (10 cm) of humped bull; symbol of strength/plough animal; from Gujarat.

Fig. 1.5: Reservoir at Dholavira (Description)

Masonry tank (80x50m) with steps; water storage; limestone/brick construction.

5. How Artefacts Are Identified

  • Food Processing: Stone/metal/terracotta querns, vessels; e.g., saddle querns for grains, "curry stones" for spices (Mackay 1937).
  • Archaeological Interpretation: Analogies with present (e.g., modern querns); multi-use artefacts complicate (e.g., faience pots luxurious?).
Fig. 1.6: Saddle Quern (Description)

Stone grinding tool (40x20cm) with convex base; worn surface; from Mohenjo-daro.

6. Mohenjo-daro: A Planned Urban Centre

  • Overview: Best-preserved site (Sindh); divided Citadel (high, walled) & Lower Town; platforms for flood protection; standardised bricks (4:2:1 ratio).
  • Planning Scale: Foundations: 4 million person-days labour; grid streets, drains first, then houses.
Fig. 1.7: Layout of Mohenjo-daro (Description)

Plan: Citadel (NW, 12 ha) with Great Bath; Lower Town (SE, 150 ha) streets 9-12m wide; drains along.

6.1 Laying Out Drains

  • System: Covered brick channels; sumps/cesspits for solids; cleaned via heaps of sand; most ancient complete system (Mackay 1948).
  • Features: Streets grid (right angles); houses with wall to street for wastewater; smaller settlements too (Lothal mud houses, burnt drains).
Fig. 1.8: A Drain in Mohenjo-daro (Description)

Brick-lined channel (1m wide) with large opening, cover slabs; from Lower Town.

6.2 Domestic Architecture

  • Houses: Courtyard-centred, rooms around; privacy (no ground windows, indirect entrance); bathrooms with drains, staircases, wells (700 total, shared?).
  • Activities: Cooking/weaving in courtyard; flat roofs.
Fig. 1.9: Isometric Drawing of a Large House (Description)

Multi-room house (20x15m): Courtyard central, well in room 6, staircases to roof, entrance alley.

6.3 The Citadel

  • Warehouse: Massive brick platform (decayed wood upper); storage?
  • Great Bath: 12x7x3m tank, watertight gypsum mortar; steps, changing rooms, drains; ritual bath? (unique context).
  • Other: Priests' quarters?; assembly halls.
Fig. 1.10: Plan of the Citadel (Description)

Layout: Great Bath central, warehouse east, wells, drains; 14x12m scale.

7. Tracking Social Differences

7.1 Burials

  • Practices: Pits, sometimes brick-lined; pottery/ornaments (afterlife belief?); jewellery for both genders (e.g., Harappa male skull beads).
  • Interpretation: No royal burials like Egypt; egalitarian? Variations subtle.
Fig. 1.11: A Copper Mirror (Description)

Round artefact (5cm) from burial; personal use; Harappa cemetery.

7.2 Looking for “Luxuries”

  • Classification: Utilitarian (daily, common: querns, pottery); Luxuries (rare, costly: faience pots, non-local materials, complex tech like beads).
  • Complications: Daily items rare = luxury? (e.g., carnelian beads from Gujarat, long-distance trade).
Fig. 1.12: A Faience Pot (Description)

Small blue-green vessel (10cm) with etched design; precious due to silica-faience process; Mohenjo-daro.

Summary

  • Harappan: Planned, standardised, egalitarian urban Bronze Age; evidence from artefacts/sites reveals subsistence, architecture; interpretations evolve (e.g., Saraswati role).
  • Interlinks: To Themes 2 (Mahajanapadas), archaeology methods.

Why This Guide Stands Out

Evidence-based: Point-wise with debates, maps; 2025 with Saraswati focus, gender analysis for holistic learning.

Key Themes & Tips

  • Aspects: Urban vs. rural, egalitarian debates, decline theories (climate, Aryan invasion vs. internal).
  • Tip: Memorise sites (HMDRG: Harappa, Mohenjo-daro, Dholavira, Rakhigarhi, Ganweriwala); draw drains/Bath.

Exam Case Studies

Mohenjo-daro planning in urbanisation; burials for social structure.

Project & Group Ideas

  • Map Harappan sites vs. modern cities.
  • Debate: Aryan invasion or climate decline?
  • Reconstruct diet from grains/bones.